| First Author | Schier LA | Year | 2019 |
| Journal | Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol | Volume | 316 |
| Issue | 5 | Pages | R448-R462 |
| PubMed ID | 30624973 | Mgi Jnum | J:273707 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:6294362 | Doi | 10.1152/ajpregu.00255.2018 |
| Citation | Schier LA, et al. (2019) T1R2+T1R3-independent chemosensory inputs contributing to behavioral discrimination of sugars in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 316(5):R448-R462 |
| abstractText | Simple sugars are thought to elicit a unitary sensation, principally via the "sweet" taste receptor type 1 taste receptor (T1R)2+T1R3, yet we previously found that rats with experience consuming two metabolically distinct sugars, glucose and fructose, subsequently licked more for glucose than fructose, even when postingestive influences were abated. The results pointed to the existence of an orosensory receptor that binds one sugar but not the other and whose signal is channeled into neural circuits that motivate ingestion. Here we sought to determine the chemosensory nature of this signal. First, we assessed whether T1R2 and/or T1R3 are necessary to acquire this behavioral discrimination, replicating our rat study in T1R2+T1R3 double-knockout (KO) mice and their wild-type counterparts as well as in two common mouse strains that vary in their sensitivity to sweeteners [C57BL/6 (B6) and 129X1/SvJ (129)]. These studies showed that extensive exposure to multiple concentrations of glucose and fructose in daily one-bottle 30-min sessions enhanced lick responses for glucose over fructose in brief-access tests. This was true even for KO mice that lacked the canonical "sweet" taste receptor. Surgical disconnection of olfactory inputs to the forebrain (bulbotomy) in B6 mice severely disrupted the ability to express this experience-dependent sugar discrimination. Importantly, these bulbotomized B6 mice exhibited severely blunted responsiveness to both sugars relative to water in brief-access lick tests, despite the fact that they have intact T1R2+T1R3 receptors. The results highlight the importance of other sources of chemosensory and postingestive inputs in shaping and maintaining "hardwired" responses to sugar. |
