|  Help  |  About  |  Contact Us

Publication : Conserved sequence elements in K promoters from mice and humans: implications for transcriptional regulation and repertoire expression.

First Author  Bemark M Year  1998
Journal  Immunogenetics Volume  47
Issue  3 Pages  183-95
PubMed ID  9435336 Mgi Jnum  J:45965
Mgi Id  MGI:1196759 Doi  10.1007/s002510050347
Citation  Bemark M, et al. (1998) Conserved sequence elements in K promoters from mice and humans: implications for transcriptional regulation and repertoire expression. Immunogenetics 47(3):183-95
abstractText  Promoter region sequences of human and mouse Igk-V genes were aligned and found to be conserved for about 200-300 base pairs (bp) within subgroups/families. No promoter similarity was found between IGKV promoters from different human subgroups. Related mouse Igk-V gene families were conserved in the promoter region but no similarity was evident when promoters from unrelated Igk-V gene families were compared. Most of the human IGKV promoter subgroups were shown to have mouse counterparts with a similarity region that extended about 150 bp upstream of the translational start codon. All promoters contained an octamer sequence element. The consensus octamer/decamer sequence was favored but only seven residues within the octamer element were strictly conserved. Furthermore, there was also sequence conservation immediately 3' of the octamer where either an A or a G residue was conserved. In addition, other DNA elements were also conserved both within the Igk-V subgroups/families and between mouse and human promoters from related subgroups/families. In several of the subgroups/families an E box of the E2A type was conserved 5' of the octamer and a CCCT element was conserved within the IGKV subgroup II and its related mouse Igk-V families. We conclude from this study that conservation of additional sequence elements besides the octamer is a common feature in Igk-V promoters but that distinct elements are conserved only within a given subgroup/family. Thus, the conservation appears to have operated at the level of function rather than at the level of recognition sequence for defined transcription factors.
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

Expression

Publication --> Expression annotations

 

Other

0 Bio Entities

0 Expression