| First Author | Nomura T | Year | 2008 |
| Journal | Mutat Res | Volume | 659 |
| Issue | 1-2 | Pages | 185-93 |
| PubMed ID | 18406661 | Mgi Jnum | J:138908 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:3806780 | Doi | 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.004 |
| Citation | Nomura T (2008) Transgenerational effects from exposure to environmental toxic substances. Mutat Res 659(1-2):185-93 |
| abstractText | Exposure of mouse germ cells to radiation and chemicals results in mutation, malformation, cancer and other adverse effects (e.g., functional disorders) in the offspring, though these findings have not been proven in human studies. Environmental toxic substances such as urethane (ethyl carbamate) which had been injected subcutaneously to 50 million people as a co-solvent of analgesics and dioxin (an endocrine disruptor) have been found to be associated with adverse effects in the progeny of mice after parental exposures. There are some reports on congenital malformations in the progeny of fathers who had been exposed to dioxin. However, these substances have not shown mutagenicity in in vitro assay systems such as bacterial systems even with S9, cell transformation assays, etc., in spite of their potent teratogenicity and carcinogenicity in in vivo systems. Urethane was negative in the mouse specific locus test for germ cell mutations, but elicited a significant response at the same loci in the offspring of mice treated during pregnancy. Further, urethane is a mutagen in Drosophila germ cell tests, specifically inducing point mutations. Dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) does not induce in vivo somatic mutations in mice and rats. It does not induce chromosomal aberrations when the mouse and/or human sperm are treated, but induces mutations at ESTR (expanded simple tandem repeat) loci in mice at low frequencies and also congenital malformations. In this paper, we first present an overview of the results of our studies on transgenerational effects of these toxic substances, compare the results with those obtained after radiation exposure, and then discuss our subsequent studies to reconcile the problems underlying their mutagenicity, teratogenicity and carcinogenicity. |
