|  Help  |  About  |  Contact Us

Publication : Intranasal immunization is superior to vaginal, gastric, or rectal immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV antibody responses.

First Author  Staats HF Year  1997
Journal  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Volume  13
Issue  11 Pages  945-52
PubMed ID  9223410 Mgi Jnum  J:42686
Mgi Id  MGI:1096117 Doi  10.1089/aid.1997.13.945
Citation  Staats HF, et al. (1997) Intranasal immunization is superior to vaginal, gastric, or rectal immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV antibody responses. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 13(11):945-52
abstractText  Vaginal anti-HIV antibody responses may be beneficial, and possibly required, for vaccine-induced protection against HIV infection acquired through receptive vaginal intercourse. We have previously determined that intranasal immunization with a hybrid HIV peptide and cholera toxin induced vaginal anti-HIV IgA responses in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. To determine if vaginal, gastric, or rectal boosting would enhance the induction of vaginal anti-HIV IgA responses over those observed with intranasal immunization only, C57BL/6 mice were intranasally immunized with the hybrid HIV peptide T1SP10MN(A) and cholera toxin (days 0 and 14) and boosted via the vaginal, gastric, or rectal route (days 7 and 28). Four intranasal immunizations was superior to all other immunizations evaluated for the induction of plasma anti-peptide IgG, vaginal anti-peptide IgG and IgA, and peptide-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity. In addition, intranasal priming with gastric boosting was associated with greatly elevated total serum IgE concentrations whereas intranasal immunization only was associated with only a modest increase in total serum IgE. These results suggest that intranasal immunization is a viable route of immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV immune responses.
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

Expression

Publication --> Expression annotations

 

Other

0 Bio Entities

0 Expression