First Author | Rutemark C | Year | 2011 |
Journal | Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A | Volume | 108 |
Issue | 43 | Pages | E934-42 |
PubMed ID | 21987785 | Mgi Jnum | J:177421 |
Mgi Id | MGI:5295090 | Doi | 10.1073/pnas.1109831108 |
Citation | Rutemark C, et al. (2011) Requirement for complement in antibody responses is not explained by the classic pathway activator IgM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(43):E934-42 |
abstractText | Animals lacking complement factors C1q, C2, C3, or C4 have severely impaired Ab responses, suggesting a major role for the classic pathway. The classic pathway is primarily initiated by antigen-Ab complexes. Therefore, its role for primary Ab responses seems paradoxical because only low amounts of specific Abs are present in naive animals. A possible explanation could be that the classic pathway is initiated by IgM from naive mice, binding with sufficient avidity to the antigen. To test this hypothesis, a knock-in mouse strain, Cmu13, with a point mutation in the gene encoding the third constant domain of the mu-heavy chain was constructed. These mice produce IgM in which proline in position 436 is substituted with serine, a mutation previously shown to abrogate the ability of mouse IgM to activate complement. Unexpectedly, the Ab response to sheep erythrocytes and keyhole limpet hemocyanin in Cmu13 mice was similar to that in WT mice. Thus, although secreted IgM and the classic pathway activation are both required for the normal primary Ab response, this does not require that IgM activate C. This led us to test Ab responses in animals lacking one of three other endogenous activators of the classic pathway: specific intracellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin R1, serum amyloid P component, and C-reactive protein. Ab responses were also normal in these animals. |