| First Author | Ma X | Year | 2019 |
| Journal | J Biol Chem | Volume | 294 |
| Issue | 11 | Pages | 3974-3986 |
| PubMed ID | 30659096 | Mgi Jnum | J:275954 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:6307268 | Doi | 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005549 |
| Citation | Ma X, et al. (2019) SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) and SMAD4 repress HIF2alpha-dependent iron-regulatory genes. J Biol Chem 294(11):3974-3986 |
| abstractText | Hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha (HIF2alpha) directly regulates a battery of genes essential for intestinal iron absorption. Interestingly, iron deficiency and overload disorders do not result in increased intestinal expression of glycolytic or angiogenic HIF2alpha target genes. Similarly, inflammatory and tumor foci can induce a distinct subset of HIF2alpha target genes in vivo These observations indicate that different stimuli activate distinct subsets of HIF2alpha target genes via mechanisms that remain unclear. Here, we conducted a high-throughput siRNA-based screen to identify genes that regulate HIF2alpha's transcriptional activity on the promoter of the iron transporter gene divalent metal transporter-1 (DMT1). SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) and SMAD4 were identified as potential transcriptional repressors. Further analysis revealed that SMAD4 signaling selectively represses iron-absorptive gene promoters but not the inflammatory or glycolytic HIF2alpha or HIF1alpha target genes. Moreover, the highly homologous SMAD2 did not alter HIF2alpha transcriptional activity. During iron deficiency, SMAD3 and SMAD4 expression was significantly decreased via proteasomal degradation, allowing for derepression of iron target genes. Several iron-regulatory genes contain a SMAD-binding element (SBE) in their proximal promoters; however, mutation of the putative SBE on the DMT1 promoter did not alter the repressive function of SMAD3 or SMAD4. Importantly, the transcription factor forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) was critical in SMAD4-induced DMT1 repression, and DNA binding of SMAD4 was essential for the repression of HIF2alpha activity, suggesting an indirect repressive mechanism through DNA binding. These results provide mechanistic clues to how HIF signaling can be regulated by different cellular cues. |
