| First Author | van der Heijden ME | Year | 2022 |
| Journal | iScience | Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 11 | Pages | 105429 |
| PubMed ID | 36388953 | Mgi Jnum | J:331590 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:7386506 | Doi | 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105429 |
| Citation | van der Heijden ME, et al. (2022) Influence of data sampling methods on the representation of neural spiking activity in vivo. iScience 25(11):105429 |
| abstractText | In vivo single-unit recordings distinguish the basal spiking properties of neurons in different experimental settings and disease states. Here, we examined over 300 spike trains recorded from Purkinje cells and cerebellar nuclei neurons to test whether data sampling approaches influence the extraction of rich descriptors of firing properties. Our analyses included neurons recorded in awake and anesthetized control mice, and disease models of ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. We find that recording duration circumscribes overall representations of firing rate and pattern. Notably, shorter recording durations skew estimates for global firing rate variability toward lower values. We also find that only some populations of neurons in the same mouse are more similar to each other than to neurons recorded in different mice. These data reveal that recording duration and approach are primary considerations when interpreting task-independent single neuron firing properties. If not accounted for, group differences may be concealed or exaggerated. |
