| First Author | Mejillano MR | Year | 2004 |
| Journal | Cell | Volume | 118 |
| Issue | 3 | Pages | 363-73 |
| PubMed ID | 15294161 | Mgi Jnum | J:91946 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:3051184 | Doi | 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.019 |
| Citation | Mejillano MR, et al. (2004) Lamellipodial versus filopodial mode of the actin nanomachinery: pivotal role of the filament barbed end. Cell 118(3):363-73 |
| abstractText | Understanding how a particular cell type expresses the lamellipodial or filopodial form of the actin machinery is essential to understanding a cell's functional interactions. To determine how a cell 'chooses' among these alternative modes of 'molecular hardware,' we tested the role of key proteins that affect actin filament barbed ends. Depletion of capping protein (CP) by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) caused loss of lamellipodia and explosive formation of filopodia. The knockdown phenotype was rescued by a CP mutant refractory to shRNA, but not by another barbed-end capper, gelsolin, demonstrating that the phenotype was specific for CP. In Ena/VASP deficient cells, CP depletion resulted in ruffling instead of filopodia. We propose a model for selection of lamellipodial versus filopodial organization in which CP is a negative regulator of filopodia formation and Ena/VASP has recruiting/activating functions downstream of actin filament elongation in addition to its previously suggested anticapping and antibranching activities. |
