|  Help  |  About  |  Contact Us

Publication : Susceptibility to ozone-induced inflammation. II. Separate loci control responses to acute and subacute exposures.

First Author  Kleeberger SR Year  1993
Journal  Am J Physiol Volume  264
Issue  1 Pt 1 Pages  L21-6
PubMed ID  8430813 Mgi Jnum  J:4016
Mgi Id  MGI:52520 Doi  10.1152/ajplung.1993.264.1.L21
Citation  Kleeberger SR, et al. (1993) Susceptibility to ozone-induced inflammation. II. Separate loci control responses to acute and subacute exposures. Am J Physiol 264(1 Pt 1):L21-6
abstractText  We demonstrated previously that inbred strains of mice are differentially susceptible to acute (3 h) and subacute (48 h) exposures to 2 parts per million (ppm) ozone (O3) and 0.30 ppm O3, respectively. Genetic studies with O3-resistant C3H/HeJ and O3-susceptible C57BL/6J strains have indicated that susceptibility to each of these O3 exposures is under Mendelian (single gene) control. In the present study, we hypothesized that the same gene controls susceptibility to the airway inflammatory responses to 2 ppm and 0.30 ppm O3 exposures. To test this hypothesis, airway inflammation was induced in 10 BXH and 16 BXD recombinant inbred (RI) strains of mice by acute as well as subacute O3 exposures. Airway inflammation was assessed by counting the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) returns obtained immediately after 48-h subacute exposure to 0.30 ppm O3, or 6 h after 3 h acute exposure to 2 ppm O3. Each RI strain was classified as susceptible or resistant to each exposure, based on a comparison of mean numbers of PMNs with those of the respective progenitor strains. For each RI set, a phenotypic strain distribution pattern (SDP) was thus derived for each exposure regimen, and the SDPs were then compared for concordance. Among the BXH RI strains, 4 of 10 responded discordantly to the two exposures: 3 were susceptible to acute exposure and resistant to subacute exposure, whereas 1 was conversely susceptible. Among the BXD RI strains, 4 of 16 were discordant: 1 was susceptible to acute exposure, and resistant to subacute exposure, whereas 3 were conversely susceptible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

Expression

Publication --> Expression annotations

 

Other

0 Bio Entities

0 Expression