| First Author | G?bczy?ski AK | Year | 2024 |
| Journal | Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol | Volume | 326 |
| Issue | 2 | Pages | R91-R99 |
| PubMed ID | 38009211 | Mgi Jnum | J:362200 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:7579745 | Doi | 10.1152/ajpregu.00154.2023 |
| Citation | Gebczynski AK, et al. (2024) Differences in the range of thermoneutral zone between mouse strains: potential effects on translational research. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 326(2):R91-R99 |
| abstractText | Laboratory mice are commonly used for studies emulating human metabolism. To render human energetics, their ratio of daily (DEE) to basal (BMR) energy expenditure of 1.7-1.8 should be maintained. However, the DEE/BMR ratio strongly depends on whether a given study using a mouse model is carried out above, or below the lower critical temperature (LCT) of the thermoneutral zone, which is rarely considered in translational research. Here, we used mice artificially selected for high or low rates of BMR along with literature data to analyze the effect of ambient temperature on possible systematic bias in DEE/BMR. We demonstrated that the estimated LCTs of mice from the high and low BMR lines differ by more than 7 degrees C. Furthermore, the range of variation of LCTs of mouse strains used in translational research spans from 23 to 33 degrees C. Differences between LCTs in our selected mice and other mouse strains are mirrored by differences in their DEE-to-BMR ratio, on average increasing it at the rate of 0.172 degrees C(-1) at temperatures below LCT. Given the wide range of LCTs in different mouse strains, we conclude that the energetic cost of thermoregulation may differ greatly for different mouse strains with a potentially large impact on translational outcomes. Thus, the LCT of a given mouse strain is an important factor that must be considered in designing translational studies. |
