| First Author | Favor J | Year | 1987 |
| Journal | Mutat Res | Volume | 177 |
| Issue | 1 | Pages | 161-9 |
| PubMed ID | 3821762 | Mgi Jnum | J:163517 |
| Mgi Id | MGI:4822195 | Doi | 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90031-5 |
| Citation | Favor J, et al. (1987) Radiation-induced forward and reverse specific locus mutations and dominant cataract mutations in treated strain BALB/c and DBA/2 male mice. Mutat Res 177(1):161-9 |
| abstractText | Strain BALB/c and DBA/2 mice were chosen to investigate the effects of genetic background on the radiation-induced mutation rate since they exhibit differences in their radiation sensitivity. Males were exposed to 3 + 3-Gy X-irradiation and mated to untreated specific locus Test-stock females. Offspring resulting from treated spermatogonia were screened for induced specific locus forward and reverse mutations and dominant cataract mutations. Since BALB/c mice are homozygous brown and albino, specific locus forward mutations could be screened at 5 of the 7 specific loci (a, d, se, p, s), while reverse mutations could be screened at the b and c loci. Strain DBA/2 is homozygous non-agouti, brown and dilute. Therefore, specific locus forward mutations could be screened at 4 loci (c, se, p, s) and reverse mutations were screened at the a, b and d loci. Results indicate no effect of genetic background on the sensitivity to mutation induction of specific locus forward mutations, while for the dominant cataract alleles strain DBA/2 exhibited a higher mutation rate than either strain BALB/c or similarly treated (101/El X C3H/El)F1 mice. If, by confirmation, these differences should be demonstrated to be real, it is interesting that strain DBA/2 should exhibit a greater sensitivity to radiation-induced dominant mutations. First, strain DBA/2 was chosen as radiation resistant or repair competent. The observation that DBA/2 exhibited a higher sensitivity to radiation-induced mutation may indicate a role for repair, albeit misrepair, in the mutation process. Second, that the effect of genotype was only observed for the mutation rate to dominant cataract alleles may reflect a difference in the spectrum of DNA alterations which result in dominant or recessive alleles. A dominant allele is more likely misinformation, such that as heterozygote it interferes with the wild-type allele. By comparison, a recessive allele may result from any DNA alteration leading to the loss of a functional gene product. One reverse mutation at each of the a and d loci was recovered in the present experiments. The similarities of the present results for radiation-induced reverse mutations with the extensive data on the spontaneous reverse mutation rates are interesting. Reverse mutations were recovered only at the a and d loci. Further, the reverse mutations recovered at the a locus were to alternate alleles (at, Aw or Asy) while true reverse mutations were apparently recovered at the d locus. |
